联想 ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 笔记本电脑简短评测 - Notebookcheck
联想 ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 笔记本电脑简短评测
Andreas Osthoff ( Yuchen Wang), 03/28/2016
过时？ 联想的最新ThinkPad P50s是ThinkPad W550s的后续产品。尽管尺寸紧凑，这台移动工作站的用户仍然可以得到足够的性能。不过相比前代产品由于处理器性能有所下降，它有一个同样来自联想的强力竞争对手。
Test device courtesy of
2.5&GHz Graphics adapter - 2048 MB, Core: 1124&MHz, Memory: 1001&MHz, DDR3, 361.91, OptimusMemory8192&MB& , DDR3L-1600, 单通道，两个内存槽，一个已占用，最大支持32GBDisplay15.5 inch 16:9,
213 PPI, WX16T028J00, LEN40B5, IPS, glossy: noMainboardIntel Skylake-U Premium PCHStorageSamsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, 256&GB& , 215 GB freeSoundcardIntel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition AudioConnections3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插口, Card Reader: 四合一 (MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint ReaderNetworkingIntel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 22.45 x 380.6 x 258.2Battery67 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 12 hCameraWebcam: 高清摄像头 (720p)Additional featuresSpeakers: 立体声, 2x 1瓦, Dolby Audio系统, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器，快速开始说明，质保信息, 36 Months WarrantyWeight2.219 kg, Power Supply: 323 g
Price1400 Euro&
>> >> >>&>>&>>&>> >>&>> >> >> >>&>>&>>
&&&&&&MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 &&&&&&Lenovo ThinkPad P50 &&&&&&Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 &&&&&&HP ZBook 15u G3 &&&&&&Dell Precision 5510
Front: no ports
Right: 2x USB 3.0, Mini-DisplayPort, fan exhaust, slot for a Kensington lock
Left: power, USB 3.0, HDMI, 3.5 mm audio, SD-card reader, Gigabit Ethernet, SmartCard reader
Rear: no ports
298cd/m²296cd/m²310cd/m²277cd/m²319cd/m²278cd/m²263cd/m²290cd/m²276cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessX-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 319&cd/m² Average: 289.7&cd/m²Brightness Distribution:&82 %Center on Battery: 320&cd/m²Contrast: 1029:1 (Black: 0.31&cd/m²)&DE Color 4.8 |
1.01-23.34 &O6.8&DE Greyscale 5.7 |
0.79-16.8 &O787.4% sRGB (Argyll) 56.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll) Gamma: 2.07
WX16T028J00, LEN40B5, IPSSHP143E, 7PHPT_LQ156D1, IGZO LEDCMN15C3, TN LEDMSI WS60-6QJE316H11SDC424B, IPSLP156WF6-SPK1, IPSVVX16T028J00, IPS LEDBrightness290361 24%284 -2%208 -28%236 -19%323 11%Brightness Distribution8287 6%89 9%77 -6%78 -5%81 -1%Black Level *0.310.4 -29%0.849 -174%0.26 16%0.34 -10%0.54 -74%Contrast1029978 -5%351 -66%912 -11%774 -25%667 -35%Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *4.84.85 -1%8.68 -81%4.42 8%2.35 51%3.45 28%Greyscale DeltaE2000 *5.74.01 30%9.3 -63%4.43 22%3.33 42%2.98 48%Gamma *2.072.182.272.232.382.06CCT62607340 17%10585 69%6133 -2%6917 10%6338 1%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)56.996 69%50.99 -10%52.5 -8%37 -35%56 -2%Color Space (Percent of sRGB)87.4100 14%80.42 -8%82.9 -5%58 -34%86.3 -1%* ... smaller is better
Display Response TimesDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.&&&&&&& Response Time Black to White28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined&# ms rise&# ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. & 65&% of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (28.5 ms).&&&&&&& Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined&# ms rise&# ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 172 (maximum) ms. & 30&% of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.2 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 219 Hz90&% brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 219&Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90&%
and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.The frequency of 219&Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.In comparison: 56&% of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 536 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 10420) Hz was measured.
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
732 Points &100% +138%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
674 Points &92% +120%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
592 Points &81% +93%
Intel Core i7-6600U
347 Points &47% +13%
Intel Core i7-6600U
330 Points &45% +7%
Intel Core i7-6500U
307 Points &42%
Intel Core i7-5500U
260 Points &36% -15%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
158 Points &100% +22%
Intel Core i7-6600U
143 Points &91% +11%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
142 Points &90% +10%
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points &89% +9%
Intel Core i7-6500U
129 Points &82%
Intel Core i7-5500U
124 Points &78% -4%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
117 Points &74% -9%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
7.93 Points &100% +130%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
7.42 Points &94% +115%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
6.48 Points &82% +88%
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.83 Points &48% +11%
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.67 Points &46% +6%
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.45 Points &44%
Intel Core i7-5500U
2.85 Points &36% -17%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
1.78 Points &100% +19%
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.63 Points &92% +9%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
1.6 Points &90% +7%
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.57 Points &88% +5%
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.49 Points &84%
Intel Core i7-5500U
1.42 Points &80% -5%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
1.32 Points &74% -11%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit6241 PointsCinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit14039 PointsCinebench R10 Shading 64Bit5472 PointsCinebench R10 Shading 32Bit5476 Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit10447 Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit4886 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit39.77 fpsCinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit3.45 PointsCinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit1.49 PointsCinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit48.45 fpsCinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit307 PointsCinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit129 PointsHelp&&&...&6300U, HD Graphics 520306&6500U, HD Graphics 520307&4210M, HD Graphics 4600307Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400
&6500U, Quadro M500M307&6500U, HD Graphics 520310&6200U, HD Graphics 520310&4600M, HD Graphics 4600310&&&...
&6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook)875
PCMark Vantage Result15876&pointsPCMark 7 Score4992&pointsPCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v22790&pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v23744&pointsHelp&&&...&6500U, HD Graphics 5204977&4800MQ, Radeon HD 8790M4983&6200U, HD Graphics 5204989Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400
&6500U, Quadro M500M4992&5200U, GeForce 940M4995&6820HQ, Quadro M3000M5003&4710HQ, Radeon R9 M265X5010&&&...
&6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook)7933
4213 Points &100% +51%
3974 Points &94% +42%
3941 Points &94% +41%
3542 Points &84% +27%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
3134 Points &74% +12%
3061 Points &73% +10%
2790 Points &66%
5100 Points &100% +36%
4900 Points &96% +31%
4677 Points &92% +25%
4442 Points &87% +19%
4323 Points &85% +15%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
4045 Points &79% +8%
3744 Points &73%
5493 Points &100% +10%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
5340 Points &97% +7%
5317 Points &97% +7%
5190 Points &94% +4%
4992 Points &91%
4892 Points &89% -2%
4474 Points &81% -10%
Legend& Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP& Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M, SK hynix SC920 512 GB& Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e&MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP& Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP& Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M, Samsung SSD PM851 512 GB MZ7TE512HMHP& Intel Core i7-6600U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
Sequential Read:
475.5 MB/sSequential Write:
304.7 MB/s512K Read:
379.3 MB/s512K Write:
303.4 MB/s4K Read:
34.31 MB/s4K Write:
89.39 MB/s4K QD32 Read:
319.9 MB/s4K QD32 Write:
279.4 MB/s
Sequential Read:
493.41 MB/sSequential Write:
289.07 MB/s4K Read:
30.35 MB/s4K Write:
76.48 MB/s4K-64 Read:
369.12 MB/s4K-64 Write:
272.77 MB/sAccess Time Read:
0.062 msAccess Time Write:
0.043 msCopy ISO:
258.18 MB/sCopy Program:
140.91 MB/sCopy Game:
188.08 MB/sScore Read:
449 PointsScore Write:
378 PointsScore Total:
1056 Points
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
46.26 fps &100% +116%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
44.29 fps &96% +107%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
37 fps &80% +73%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
21.42 fps &46%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
18.72 fps &40% -13%
AMD FirePro W4190M
18.62 fps &40% -13%
Intel HD Graphics 520
11.62 fps &25% -46%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
38.95 fps &100% +89%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
37.48 fps &96% +82%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
34 fps &87% +65%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
20.62 fps &53%
AMD FirePro W4190M
16.87 fps &43% -18%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
16.28 fps &42% -21%
Intel HD Graphics 520
10.15 fps &26% -51%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
3.2 fps &100% +504%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
3.16 fps &99% +496%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
0.69 fps &22% +30%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
0.53 fps &17%
AMD FirePro W4190M
0.41 fps &13% -23%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
0.38 fps &12% -28%
Intel HD Graphics 520
0.06 fps &2% -89%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
38.46 fps &100% +245%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
30 fps &78% +169%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
29.89 fps &78% +168%
AMD FirePro W4190M
16.38 fps &43% +47%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
12.03 fps &31% +8%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
11.14 fps &29%
Intel HD Graphics 520
10.89 fps &28% -2%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
14.68 fps &100% +54%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
14.4 fps &98% +51%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
12 fps &82% +26%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
9.51 fps &65%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
7.05 fps &48% -26%
AMD FirePro W4190M
6.09 fps &41% -36%
Intel HD Graphics 520
1.7 fps &12% -82%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
24.25 fps &100% +299%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
21.35 fps &88% +251%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
20 fps &82% +229%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
6.32 fps &26% +4%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6.08 fps &25%
Intel HD Graphics 520
6.05 fps &25% 0%
AMD FirePro W4190M
4.98 fps &21% -18%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
33.95 fps &100% +77%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
32.52 fps &96% +70%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
31 fps &91% +62%
AMD FirePro W4190M
19.89 fps &59% +4%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
19.13 fps &56%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
17.1 fps &50% -11%
Intel HD Graphics 520
2.95 fps &9% -85%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
71.68 fps &100% +93%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
62.99 fps &88% +69%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
62 fps &86% +67%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
37.22 fps &52%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
33.02 fps &46% -11%
AMD FirePro W4190M
31.41 fps &44% -16%
Intel HD Graphics 520
22.64 fps &32% -39%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
54 fps &100% +42%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
53.48 fps &99% +40%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
48.98 fps &91% +29%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
46.7 fps &86% +23%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
38.08 fps &71%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
46.43 fps &100% +127%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
43.49 fps &94% +113%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
39 fps &84% +91%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
20.68 fps &45% +1%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
20.44 fps &44%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
54 fps &100% +15%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
52.47 fps &97% +12%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
48.27 fps &89% +3%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
46.9 fps &87%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
46.82 fps &87% 0%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
58.31 fps &100% +24%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
56.89 fps &98% +21%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
56 fps &96% +19%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
49.5 fps &85% +6%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
46.88 fps &80%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
21 fps &100% +41%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
17.54 fps &84% +18%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
17.4 fps &83% +17%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
15.68 fps &75% +5%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
14.87 fps &71%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
51 fps &100% +29%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
47.71 fps &94% +20%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
46.69 fps &92% +18%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
41.78 fps &82% +5%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
39.63 fps &78%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
43.93 fps &100% +23%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
42.91 fps &98% +20%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
40 fps &91% +12%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
39.52 fps &90% +11%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
35.63 fps &81%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
43.31 fps &100% +47%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
42.14 fps &97% +43%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
41 fps &95% +39%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
30.91 fps &71% +5%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
29.41 fps &68%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1434 Samples/s &100% +52%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1426 Samples/s &99% +51%
AMD FirePro W4190M
1034 Samples/s &72% +9%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
945 Samples/s &66%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
889 Samples/s &62% -6%
Intel HD Graphics 520
529 Samples/s &37% -44%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
508 Samples/s &35% -46%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
903 Samples/s &100% +139%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
791 Samples/s &88% +109%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
534 Samples/s &59% +41%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
378 Samples/s &42%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
253 Samples/s &28% -33%
Intel HD Graphics 520
224 Samples/s &25% -41%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
21.75 KOPT/s &100% +70%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
21.63 KOPT/s &99% +69%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
17 KOPT/s &78% +33%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
12.82 KOPT/s &59%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
12.28 GB/s &100% +129%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
9.28 GB/s &76% +73%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
7.38 GB/s &60% +37%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
5.37 GB/s &44%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
155.76 MPix/s &100% +57%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
155.73 MPix/s &100% +57%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
127.5 MPix/s &82% +28%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
99.46 MPix/s &64%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
53.4 fps &100% +154%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
52.5 fps &98% +150%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
44.9 fps &84% +114%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
21.9 fps &41% +4%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
21 fps &39%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
43.4 fps &100% +117%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
33.9 fps &78% +70%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
32.4 fps &75% +62%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
20 fps &46%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
18.6 fps &43% -7%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
16.2 fps &100% +138%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
13.8 fps &85% +103%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
13.2 fps &81% +94%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6.8 fps &42%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
20.4 fps &100% +214%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
20.3 fps &100% +212%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
18.7 fps &92% +188%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6.5 fps &32%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
63578 Points &100% +140%
Intel HD Graphics 520
58178 Points &92% +119%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
41248 Points &65% +56%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
40175 Points &63% +51%
AMD FirePro W4190M
37532 Points &59% +41%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
28455 Points &45% +7%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
26525 Points &42%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
76826 Points &100% +191%
Intel HD Graphics 520
66190 Points &86% +151%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
41161 Points &54% +56%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
39220 Points &51% +49%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
38601 Points &50% +46%
AMD FirePro W4190M
35930 Points &47% +36%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
26395 Points &34%
AMD FirePro W4190M
44477 Points &100% +65%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
43922 Points &99% +63%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
41557 Points &93% +54%
Intel HD Graphics 520
40867 Points &92% +51%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
39650 Points &89% +47%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
26992 Points &61%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
14821 Points &33% -45%
Intel HD Graphics 520
39969 Points &100%
Intel HD Graphics 520
40401 Points &100%
Intel HD Graphics 520
38530 Points &100%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
16940 Points &100% +169%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
16337 Points &96% +160%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
16180 Points &96% +157%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
6591 Points &39% +5%
AMD FirePro W4190M
6567 Points &39% +4%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6287 Points &37%
Intel HD Graphics 520
6097 Points &36% -3%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
30495 Points &100% +268%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
27157 Points &89% +228%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
23777 Points &78% +187%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
9092 Points &30% +10%
AMD FirePro W4190M
8513 Points &28% +3%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
8281 Points &27%
Intel HD Graphics 520
7505 Points &25% -9%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
7641 Points &100% +124%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
7312 Points &96% +114%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
6224 Points &81% +82%
Intel HD Graphics 520
3681 Points &48% +8%
AMD FirePro W4190M
3649 Points &48% +7%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
3413 Points &45%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
3359 Points &44% -2%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
10951 Points &100%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
11179 Points &100%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
3952 Points &100% +176%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
3813 Points &96% +166%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3344 Points &85% +134%
AMD FirePro W4190M
1517 Points &38% +6%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
1432 Points &36%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
1424 Points &36% -1%
Intel HD Graphics 520
863 Points &22% -40%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
4243 Points &100% +164%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
4126 Points &97% +156%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3517 Points &83% +118%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
1621 Points &38% +1%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
1610 Points &38%
AMD FirePro W4190M
1588 Points &37% -1%
Intel HD Graphics 520
935 Points &22% -42%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
10414 Points &100% +113%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
10118 Points &97% +107%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
8526 Points &82% +74%
AMD FirePro W4190M
5401 Points &52% +10%
Intel HD Graphics 520
5291 Points &51% +8%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
4893 Points &47%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
4665 Points &45% -5%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1628 Points &100% +228%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1590 Points &98% +221%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
1401 Points &86% +182%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
496 Points &30%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
483 Points &30% -3%
Intel HD Graphics 520
305 Points &19% -39%
3DMark 06 Standard12842&points3DMark Vantage P Result no PhysX7959&points3DMark 11 Performance2350&points3DMark (2013) Ice Storm Standard Score26525&points3DMark (2013) Cloud Gate Standard Score6287&points3DMark (2013) Fire Strike Standard Score1432&pointsHelp&&&...&4210U, GeForce 840M2322&5500U, GeForce 940M2329&4200U, GeForce 840M2336Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400
&6500U, Quadro M500M2350&4210U, GeForce 840M2361&4510U, GeForce 840M2370&3610QM, GeForce GT 650M2371&&&...
&6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook)15462
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
137.8 fps &40%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
279 fps &80% +102%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
348.7 fps &100% +153%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
134 fps &38% -3%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
82.5 fps &24% -40%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
62.7 fps &39%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
144 fps &88% +130%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
162.8 fps &100% +160%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
66 fps &41% +5%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
52.1 fps &32% -17%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
34.4 fps &32%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
98 fps &91% +185%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
107.3 fps &100% +212%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
36 fps &34% +5%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
35.4 fps &33% +3%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
17.3 fps &34%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
43 fps &83% +149%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
51.5 fps &100% +198%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
16.8 fps &33% -3%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
30.3 fps &100%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
22.74 fps &75% -25%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
18.6 fps &41%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
14 fps &31% -25%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
45.3 fps &100% +144%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
18.28 fps &40% -2%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
10.4 fps &40%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
8 fps &31% -23%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
25.7 fps &100% +147%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
10.84 fps &42% +4%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
21.6 fps &100%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
<span class="r_compare_bars_number__371_ fps &100%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
94.9 fps &49%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
195 fps &100% +105%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
85.19 fps &44% -10%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
187.9 fps &96% +98%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
73 fps &37% -23%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
73.46 fps &38% -23%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
54 fps &42%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
111 fps &87% +106%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
38.42 fps &30% -29%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
128 fps &100% +137%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
52 fps &41% -4%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
51.4 fps &40% -5%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
43.8 fps &39%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
100 fps &89% +128%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
34.08 fps &30% -22%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
112.9 fps &100% +158%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
42 fps &37% -4%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
42.27 fps &37% -3%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
14.7 fps &37%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
38 fps &96% +159%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
13.64 fps &35% -7%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
39.5 fps &100% +169%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
15 fps &38% +2%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
20.86 fps &53% +42%
ultra (2013) 137.862.734.417.3fps
(2013) 94.95443.814.7fps
(2013) 48.938.322.911.6fps
(2014) 33.723.419.19.6fps
(2015) 82.632.819.512.7fps
(2015) 30.518.910.2fps
(2015) 56.533.315.213fps
(2015) 46.932.419.213.1fps
(2015) 35.629.616.214.5fps
(2016) 30.318.610.4fps
Noise Level
30 / 30 / 30 dB(A)Load
33.5 / 41.9 dB(A)
&&30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: &&&Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500MIntel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000MIntel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190MMSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620MIdle Minimum *3030 -0%29.8 1%37.2 -24%30 -0%26.9 10%Idle Average *3030 -0%29.8 1%37.2 -24%30 -0%26.9 10%Idle Maximum *3030 -0%29.8 1%37.2 -24%30 -0%26.9 10%Load Average *33.542.08 -26%39.5 -18%42.1 -26%34.5 -3%30.4 9%Load Maximum *41.946.78 -12%43.2 -3%50.7 -21%42.1 -0%38.1 9%* ... smaller is better
&27.4 &C30.7 &C37.5 &C&&27.3 &C34.4 &C44.2 &C&&26.5 &C32.3 &C34.4 &C&
Maximum: 44.2 &CAverage: 32.7 &C
41.1 &C33.8 &C27.3 &C57.8 &C55.9 &C28.9 &C32.3 &C30.2 &C25.7 &C
Maximum: 57.8 &CAverage: 37 &C Power Supply (max.)& 46.3 &C | Room Temperature&20 &C
| Fennel FIRT 550Idle
&24.8 &C25.2 &C25.3 &C&&24.3 &C24.9 &C26.4 &C&&23.9 &C24.5 &C24.3 &C&
Maximum: 26.4 &CAverage: 24.8 &C
26.3 &C25.7 &C25.2 &C27.6 &C28.1 &C25.8 &C24.9 &C24.2 &C23.9 &C
Maximum: 28.1 &CAverage: 25.7 &C Power Supply (max.)& 30.5 &C | Room Temperature&20 &C
| Fennel FIRT 550
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500MIntel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000MIntel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190MMSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620MMaximum Upper Side *44.245.8 -4%44.6 -1%42.3 4%36.7 17%36.5 17%Maximum Bottom *57.846.7 19%46 20%60.1 -4%41.3 29%51.2 11%Idle Upper Side *26.431.2 -18%25.8 2%32.7 -24%31.1 -18%23.9 9%Idle Bottom *28.131.9 -14%27.4 2%33.1 -18%36.2 -29%25.7 9%* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.18 / 0.37 WattIdle 4.3 / 9.7 / 10.2 Watt
45.7 / 55.8 Watt
max: &&&&&&&&Gossen Metrahit Energy
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500MIntel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000MIntel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190MMSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620MIdle Minimum *4.38.6 -100%4.3 -0%18.8 -337%5.6 -30%4 7%Idle Average *9.716.2 -67%7.9 19%29.6 -205%8.6 11%9.6 1%Idle Maximum *10.216.7 -64%11.5 -13%30.3 -197%9.3 9%10.8 -6%Load Average *45.782.6 -81%43.3 5%90.4 -98%89.5 -96%36.9 19%Load Maximum *55.8131.8 -136%72.3 -30%150.2 -169%105 -88%54.5 2%* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
WiFi Surfing v1.3
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
Load (maximum brightness)
67&Wh, 6500U, Quadro M500M56&Wh, E3-1505M v5, Quadro M1000M90&Wh, 6600U, FirePro W4190MMSI WS60-6QJE316H1147&Wh, E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M90&Wh, 6820HQ, Quadro M2000M116&Wh, 5500U, Quadro K620MReader / Idle1107428 -61%756 -32%160 -86%860 -22%1728 56%Load129109 -16%141 9%51 -60%113 -12%247 91%WiFi v1.3408286 -30%312 -24%106 -74%498 22%715 75%H.264537197 -63%141 -74%533 -1%667 24%WiFi298
Pro+ 坚固的机身
+ 优秀的屏幕
+ 出色的键盘
+ 优秀的电池续航
+ 接口速度快
+ 出色的无线网络速度
+ 三年质保Cons- 借口布局
- 处理器性能作为工作站来说较弱
- 处理器无法完全发挥加速性能
- 不便于维护升级
- 无最新接口（USB 3.1，USB－C，Thunderbolt，M.2-2280）
- 屏幕闪烁亮度控制
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad P50s. Test model courtesy of Notebooksandmore.ThinkPad P50s是上一代的的Skylake更新，这也成为了这台移动工作站最大的问题。除了处理器，它并没有什么实质性的改变，你依然无法用到最新的接口（USB-C, Thunderbolt, M.2固态硬盘, M.2-2280）。我们甚至可以直接复制W550的评测总结，因为你会拿到手上的依然是一台缺少处理性能的轻薄工作站。当然这取决于你的需要，当然移动超低电压处理器也不算孱弱，不过我们的测试机甚至无法发挥应有的全部潜能。为什么超极本如可以提高热设计功率限制，而工作站不能呢？联想的不同产品团队显然需要增强交流。
这也把我们带到了ThinkPad P50s的另一个问题前面：。由于机身得到重新设计，它提供了所有的最新接口，更强的性能，而噪音散热却有了改善。P50s的优势在于更薄的机身和较轻的重量（包括电源适配器）。不过如果你真的关注便携性的话，的地位几乎无可撼动。ThinkPad P50s仍然是一台不错的移动工作站，但是它相比前代机型几乎没有改进。因此我们很难向用户推荐这台设备——特别是在这么强的竞争之中。如果你无法享受联想的教育优惠，那么联想和戴尔的设备售价将会十分相近。我们的教育机型的售价为1400欧元（约10172人民币），十分有竞争力，不过你也可以选择售价1440欧元（约10462人民币）的ThinkPad P50。你需要接受稍差的全高清屏幕，不过可以得到更强的性能和更新的科技。
关于最终得分：我们的评分系统在更新之后除了通用应用程序性能分数还包括了设备的工作站应用程序性能得分，这会影响设备的总分。例如P50s在办公笔记本电脑分类中将会得到85%的总分。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击。&
Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 - 03/16/2016
v5Andreas OsthoffChassis90&/&98&&&92%Keyboard94%Pointing Device87%Connectivity65&/&81&&&80%Weight62&/&66&&&93%Battery90%Display86%Games Performance63%Application Performance82%Temperature88&/&95&&&92%Noise91&/&90&&&100%Audio68%Camera50&/&85&&&59%Average76%79%Workstation - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
联想 ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 笔记本电脑简短评测 Andreas Osthoff,&&(Update:&)