TGirl World Review on PornAdept
franks-tgirlworld.com review
PORN ADEPT V2.0Reviewing porn sites since 2003!
TGirl World Review
. We have old review archived for this site, you can read it
Quick site rank and complete review of
TGirl World | Categories: , ,
Our Rating: 88/100
Quality of Content: 23/25
Purchase Value: 18/20
Leased/Own Content: 15/15
Update Frequency: 8/10
Content Variety: 8/10
Tour Promises/Reality: 5/5
Originality: 7/10
Navigation: 4/5
Images: yes
Live Shows / Chat: yes
Streaming Video: yes
Downloadable Video: yes
User Rating For FranksTGirlWorld
User Rating: 56/100 - based on 231 votes.
Your rate:
Choose rate
1 - total shit
3 - garbage
6 - poor site
7 - standard site
10 - the best
Price & Payment Options
Standard price: $35.99 (30 days, recurring at $35.99 / 30 days)
Standard price: $71.99 (90 days, recurring at $71.99 / 90 days)
Standard price: $125.00 (180 days, recurring at $125.00 / 180 days)
Standard price: $240.00 (365 days, non recurring)
2 pre-checked cross-sales
Tour Promises
Franks-TGirlWorld.com promises shemales from around the world in hardcore action, over 1200 models, thousands of downloadable videos, photos, real action and totally uncensored content.
My Opinion About FranksTGirlWorld
Franks TGirl World has been around since 2002 and was one of the first sites featuring one guy travelling the globe to find the hottest shemales. It's been over a decade since Frank first set out on his adventures. Nothing has deterred him from his love of shemales and hopefully nothing will in the future because when it comes to hotties with nice tits and big throbbing cocks, this guy has a knack of tracking down the best.
The members' area does have a few upsells and the join page also has pre-checked cross-sales. These are two things I'm not particularly keen on, but with as much content as FranksTGirlWorld offers, it's not difficult to deal with these this disadvantage even if it is irritating. Also, with multiple scenes added one day every week, the amount of content continues to increase and there is already more than enough that it's not likely you'll ever get through the entire collection. Additionally, there are bonus movies and photos and there is a community forum that you can participate in, although there aren't complete bonus sites with this membership.
Navigating the site and the different sections is pretty good. The featured menu takes you directly to updates and to models, as well as to the highest member-rated scenes. There aren't a lot of sorting tools, but if you are looking for content that is a bit more specific to your desires, then the advanced search should serve you well. There is an interactive map enabling you to find shemales from specific countries and locations in the world and you can also pinpoint models by their ethnicity. However, another feature gives you the opportunity to really narrow things down by cross-checking the types of shoot with other options like breast and cock size, extra fetishes, clothes and even whether or not the models have pubic hair.
The advanced search will come in handy to browse the 2264 scenes. When you click a scene you are basically entering into a specific model's profile page. There are some short bios, but the site isn't really very personal and Frank doesn't provide a lot of written information about the babes or the scenes. In any case, from the profile pages you can access all the content from the specific shemales and many of them provide more than one movie and one set of photos. Even so, I'm not sure that this affects the overall amount. If it does, then it's only to increase the amount, but the 2264 scenes seems to be in keeping with the amount of time the site has been online.
When you go through the archive, you will find that older movies and photos are not as high in quality as the newer scenes. This isn't particularly bad, but only because FranksTGirlWorld has always attempted to provide members with qualities that are in keeping with the times. Older 360p movies, for example, would have been the standard at a time when this was considered a better than average video resolution. The good news is that these days you end up getting
photos, 500x355 streams and SD, as well as an HD MP4 (2350kbps, ) downloads. While MP4 is the only downloadable format being uploaded, movies prior to 2011 appear to be mostly WMV files ranging from 720p to smaller resolutions.
Action on Franks T-Girl World varies a lot, but Frank, as the adventurer and cameraman, often appears in scenes. He isn't always the one having sex, though. In fact, a lot of the scenes on this site focus in on the shemales in solo scenes. To give you an idea of the breakdown, currently there are 81 hardcore scenes with shemales on shemales a lot of the time. There are only five POV videos and 1632 solo scenes, but there are other action categories that include gonzo, fruit basket and others.
Final Verdict
FranksTGirlWorld is a huge site offering up sexy shemales of all ethnicities and from several countries around the world. There are a lot of seriously hot babes and even though Frank may take part in the films as a cameraman, much of this collection revolves around solo shemales getting off for your pleasure. The quality is good overall, although it would be nice to have 1080p HD films available and even though older episodes are only offered in WMV, at least they are also good quality. The regular price may be a bit higher than most sites, but you are getting so much content and such a diverse range of shemales, that it does seem worth the while.
Members Area ScreenShots
Sample Pictures
TGirl World review scores on other review sites
Below is a list of review scores from a limited number of trusted porn review sites.
This way you can compare them with our rating and make a more educated decision.
Average score on other review sites : 85/100
FranksTGirlWorld reviews archive
Similar SitesFranks Censoring Women &
Law Review
| Boston University
Censoring Women
Online Symposium: Danielle Keats Citron’s Hate Crimes in Cyberspace
95 B.U. L. Rev. Annex 61 (2015)
The second annual Anti-Slavery Convention of American Women was scheduled to take place in Pennsylvania Hall in May 1838. The women who organized the event were known for their outspoken activism calling for the abolition of slavery and in favor of women’s equal rights. As history scholar Sally G. McMillen relates,
The week before the upcoming interracial forum, hecklers were in the street denouncing it. Notices posted around the city urged people who cared about their jobs and the Constitution to attend and protest this convention of ‘amalgamators.’ . . . As the convention opened . . . some three thousand protestors filled the aisles and galleries of the hall and began to smash windows. The women found it almost impossible to conduct their meeting . . . , hissing and shouting drowned them out . . . . Protestors threatened speakers with bricks and rocks . . . . The mayor refused [to provide police protection] claiming that the female abolitionists had brought this chaos on themselves . . . . [M]obs broke into the hall, opened the gas jets, and set the auditorium on fire.
It was neither the first nor the last time that women’s attempt to exercise their right to free expression would be met with violence and intimidation, or that women would be blamed for bringing the abuse upon themselves. Throughout history, there have been countless eruptions of fear and rage against women who dared to speak, work, dress, travel, or be educated in ways that men found unacceptable. Women have been threatened, stalked, harassed, beaten, sexually assaulted, and even killed for entering spaces traditionally considered the exclusive provinces of men, from voting booths to marathons to the military. The multiple forms of unjustified aggression directed at women in public spaces, workplaces, and schools send a powerful message: shut up or get out.
To anyone who truly cares about the value of free speech, this history of silencing and exclusion should be an outrage. To defend the First Amendment is to defend equal access to its principles and its protections. To truly believe in the “marketplace of ideas” means to reject speech monopolies and speech cartels, to challenge the hoarding of expressive rights by the most privileged members of society. A society that allows the relentless smothering of the viewpoints of certain groups, based not on the content of the expression but on the identity of the speakers, is not “free”—it is tyrannical.
In the early days of the Internet, many people believed that the creation of “cyberspace” would usher in a heretofore-unimagined era of freedom of expression. This utopian vision was effusively described by John Perry Barlow in his 1996 Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace: “We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth. We are creating a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.” It is perhaps telling that Barlow, who was one of the co-founders of the influential Electronic Frontier Foundation, did not name gender as one of the categories of privilege or prejudice to be discarded in cyberspace. What may have been a mere rhetorical oversight has been rendered particularly poignant by the Internet’s development with regard to women’s expression.
The Internet did not bring the long history of silencing women to an end. The Internet multiplied the possibilities of expression, to be sure, but it also multiplied the possibilities of repression. We have not in fact yet approached a world that allows a woman to “express . . . her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.” Women who publicly express opinions on any subject, from sports to video games to politics, are routinely subjected to a barrage of sexualized and violent threats. Sexual harassment of women in schools and workplaces has migrated from in-person communication to social media, where it can be both more pernicious and harder to regulate. Victims of stalking and domestic violence now face a new array of sophisticated and invasive surveillance technologies that place them and their loved ones in increased danger. So-called “revenge porn” destroys women’s careers, family relationships, educational opportunities, and psychological health. The ubiquitous presence of undetectable recording devices (and the ability to transmit footage to the world at large within seconds) has produced a cottage industry of sexual humiliation, from “upskirt” photos to video footage of sexual assaults. Women are told that the only way to be protected from these violations and indignities is to restrict their self-expression: Don’t express your opinions publicly. Don’t compete with male colleagues. Don’t anger your abusive spouse. Don’t take naked pictures. Don’t wear skirts. Don’t get raped.
The cumulative effect of all this is to silence women. It teaches women to be docile, submissive, sexless, conventional, and devoid of opinions, or else face devastating injury to their privacy, their careers, their safety, their families. Even as the Internet has provided new avenues of expression and communication, it has given tremendous power and voice to an astonishingly regressive and censorious attitude toward women. As John Stuart Mill recognized in 1859, society’s power to strip individuals of their freedom and autonomy can be far more devastating than the state’s:
Society can and does exec and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself.
Yet when women call for legal and social and educational reform to address this censorship, they are called censors. When they attempt to challenge these deprivations of their right to freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment, they are accused of trampling on the First Amendment. Harassment, threats, nonconsensual pornography, and stalking are all defended as “speech,” while women’s resistance is condemned as “censorship.”
To argue this can only mean that freedom of expression means freedom of expression for elites, that women are not considered equals in their claim for the rights so valued by our society. It can only mean that we live in a society where the right to shout “murderer!” at a woman as she walks into a Planned Parenthood clinic outweighs that woman’s right to seek legal medica that the right to “joke” about raping or killing a woman who criticizes sexism in gaming culture outweighs that woman’s right to that the right to distribute private, sexually explicit photos of a woman for entertainment purposes outweighs that woman’s right to privacy and sexual expression. It can only mean that we as a society are willing to tolerate a state of affairs in which women are routinely forced to go into hiding merely for expressing opinions that some find controversial. It can only mean, in short, that free speech has never been, and is not now, for women.
The important work of Professor Citron invites us to challenge this state of affairs. She invites us not to be taken in by those who would characterize this conflict as a choice between glorious “free speech” and much-derided “social justice”—indeed invites us to recognize that the true conflict is very often between free speech (of harassers) and free speech (of their targets). She invites us to confront the undeniably gendered dimensions of cyber harassment and recall the history of discrimination that is inextricable from the history of free speech.
When we do so, those of us who are genuinely committed to the principle of free speech for all—not just the privileged classes—recognize that law and society must change. We will be better equipped to diagnose the forces that have always driven the censorship of women, namely, the fear and rage of men facing the loss of unearned privilege and illegitimate domination. What is and has always been at stake is nothing less than women’s equal right to free speech.
Professor of Law, University of Miami School of L Legislative and Tech Policy Director and Vice-President, Cyber Civil Rights Initiative.
Sally G. McMillen, Seneca Falls and the Origins of the Women’s Rights Movement 67-8 (2008).
John Perry Barlow, Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace,
Women are of course not the only group to be targeted for harassment online or off. Racial minorities, sexual minorities, religious minorities, and the poor of both genders are all frequent targets for abuse and discrimination, and these effects are multiplied for individuals who exist at the intersection of several of these identities. See Kimberle Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics, 1989 U. Chi. Legal F. 139 (1989). This post focuses on the particular impact that such harassment has on women.
According to one study, men are “harassed” online more often than women, but the harassment they face tends to be relatively impersonal and trivial compared to the targeted, aggressive, and sexualized abuse that women encounter. “Although men are more likely than women to experience low-level abuse online (a.k.a. name-calling), women — specifically young women — are more likely to experience severe sexual harassment, online stalking and sustained abuse.” Emma Gray, ‘Scandal’ Exposed The Terrifying Abuse Women Face Online, Huff. Post (Oct. 16, 2015), .
See Soraya Nadia McDonald, Ashley Judd says she’s pressing charges against Twitter trolls who threatened rape, Wash. Post, March 18, 2015, .
See Kyle Wagner, The Future of the Culture Wars is Here, and It’s GamerGate, Deadspin (Oct. 14, 2014), .
See Michelle Goldberg, Feminist writers are so besieged by online abuse that some have begun to retire, Wash. Post, Feb. 20, 2015, .
The controversy that erupted in October 2015 after the cancellation of two scheduled panels for the popular technology conference South by Southwest (SXSW) Interactive is a case in point. One of these panels, SavePoint: A Discussion on the Gaming Community, was strongly affiliated with “GamerGate,” a loose collective of individuals aggrieved by gender-based critiques of games and the gaming community. GamerGate supporters have waged a sustained campaign of rape, death threats, and other abuse of prominent female gamers and critics (see note 6). The other panel, Level Up: Overcoming Harassment in Games, featured several women who had been the subjects of online harassment by GamerGaters and others. Given the past tactics of GamerGate supporters, many of the Level Up panelists voiced security concerns about their panel, but were ignored by conference administrators. After SXSW itself received “threats of on-site violence,” however, the director of SXSW Interactive, Hugh Forrest, announced that the panels would be canceled. See T.C. Sottek, Vox Media and The Verge will not attend SXSW unless it takes harassment seriously, The Verge (Oct. 27, 2015), . As one of the Level Up panelists, Katherine Cross, stated, “SXSW is effectively telling online harassers that their threats are a winning strategy . . . . A success for harassers will only encourage more of the same.” Sara Ashley O’Brien, Gamer: SXSW isn’t taking online harassment seriously, CNN (Oct 28, 2015), .
See Mary Anne Franks, Sexual Harassment 2.0, 71 Md. L. Rev. 655 (2012).
See Cindy Southworth & Sarah Tucker, Technology, Stalking, and Domestic Violence Victims, 76 Miss. L.J. 667 (2007)
See Danielle Keats Citron & Mary Anne Franks, Criminalizing Revenge Porn, 49 Wake Forest L. Rev. 345 (2014).
See Kira Cochraine, Creepshots and revenge porn: how paparazzi culture affects women, Guardian, Sept. 21, 2012, .
See Mary Anne Franks, Adventures in Victim-Blaming: Revenge Porn Edition, Concurring Opinions (Feb. 1, 2013), .
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859), Ch. 1.
See, e.g., Mary Anne Franks, Free Speech Elitism, Huff. Post (Jan. 23, 2014), .
Woman who created #ShoutYourAbortion in hiding due to death threats, The Week, Oct. 1, 2015.Adventures in the Sin Bin (2012) - Full Cast & Crew - IMDb
CHARTS & TRENDS
16 hours ago
22 hours ago
Collider.com
Contribute to This Page
Explore More
Share this page:
User Lists
Related lists from IMDb users
a list of 1630 titles
created 09&Mar&2016
a list of 4089 titles
created 23&May&2014
a list of 4426 titles
created 18&Apr&2013
a list of 4392 titles
created 04&Nov&2012
a list of 707 titles
created 04&Jul&2012
Recently Viewed
Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet!
Follow IMDb onS60第一版和第二版
您现在的位置是：&&>&&>&
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：装正太的大叔&发表于： 14:06:42
由 MonsterUp Adventures 开发的《怪兽跳跃》玩法虽说不上有多新颖，
但挑战性和耐玩度方面却都有不错的表现。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：装正太的大叔&发表于： 13:40:10
正宗好游戏，正宗好测评。你现在正在收看的是由【Dospy 论坛】独家冠名播出的中国好测评，这个冬天还是熟悉的味道。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：5800xminw &发表于： 23:43:17
想体验美国西部风情吗？ 想成为西部英雄吗？那就快来体验六发左轮吧！
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：SK、挥霍青春&发表于： 23:31:10
俺猜，俺猜猜猜， 疯狂猜成语，你解决智商急促的利器
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：令狐小寒 &发表于： 01:09:12
游戏背景：由马克褢德鲁斯和布兰达查普执导，影片以中世纪的苏格兰为舞台，讲述主人公梅莉达抗争传统束缚，为了争取自己获得真爱的权力，从而改变自己命运的美丽故事
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：令狐小寒&发表于： 19:55:21
微软旗下343工作室沥血新作《光环: 斯巴达突袭》(Halo: Spartan Assault)终于登陆Win8/RT和WP8平台
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：淡蓝若梦&发表于： 12:27:41
疯狂猜歌简单易上手，具有十足的趣味性和挑战性。玩家不论是一个人闲暇无聊，还是二人世界，或是朋友聚会。
来源：泡泡网&作者：不详&发表于： 10:54:59
如果从水龙头里流出来的不是水，而是一颗颗晶莹剔透的钻石，那么除了是在做白日梦之外，还有可能是身临《我的钻石》这款颇为有爱的游戏当中，该游戏用其特有的方式来向玩家们展现了物理收集游戏风采。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：★雨下sirup★&发表于： 19:03:43
回到《火箭飞人》这款游戏的本身，即使我们看到有很多的不足，但是对于第一版的游戏来说，已经达到了不错的效果,界面简单不失华丽
来源：泡泡网&作者：不详&发表于： 17:34:40
《猴子也疯狂》由知名手机游戏公司Com2uS推出，是一款轻松、愉快、爽快度较高的休闲游戏。游戏支持众多语言，其中支持中文，我们可以与全世界的玩家尽情的对战。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：啊司匹林&发表于： 18:11:32
你充当的角色是Casey’s，你的任务的通过各种介质的配合然后碰触到那闪亮的星星。但这一切都需要靠你巧妙的设计方案才能完成，每关都会给你提供不同的游戏道具（气球、矮木桌、剪刀、纸箱......），然后由你去设计摆放。游戏开始会有提示，关卡也非常简单。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：啊司匹林&发表于： 17:45:51
玩家扮演的是一个拥有高科技武器的小怪物（它有10把各具特色的抢，还有各种辅助装备，地雷、手雷、核弹、防护盾……），开着炫酷的飞船去章鱼外星人的星球，寻找并拯救出被章鱼怪绑架走的爱宠。在寻找的过程中将会有很多形态各异的外星人来阻拦你，它们不光是形态的不同，各自也有不同的能力，要多加小心！你需要用强大的武器，华丽的走位将外星人消灭干净，拯救出可怜的爱宠！
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：啊司匹林&发表于： 11:16:41
游戏的主人公一不小心迷失在一个恐怖的神庙中，这里充满了各种危险的怪物和可怕的陷阱，现在，只有发狂的奔跑才能将一切的危险甩到身后。在狂奔的路上你展示着自己的各项武艺，翻过古庙围墙,爬上悬崖峭壁,急速的变向转弯、跳跃、下滑，然后来躲过障碍物。路途中你还能所搜集各种金币，然后购买能量!
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：无为无畏&发表于： 16:10:08
作为移动平台上最成功的FPS游戏，Gameloft的现代战争系列已推出到第三代，这代的游戏名字是Fallen Nation即堕落的国度。继上个月登录iOS平台后，在年末之际终于来到Android平台，下面就让笔者来带大家体验下这款游戏。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：无为无畏&发表于： 15:08:16
My Paper Plane 3是一款3D躲避飞行游戏，游戏中，玩家操控一个纸飞机穿越各种障碍并在飞行过程中收集奖励物品，而飞行轨迹取决于风向和我们的操控。这款游戏现已更新到了第三版，画质和可玩性都有很大的提升。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：无为无畏&发表于： 16:11:13
血之荣耀(Blood & Glory)是开发商Glu Mobile最新在Android平台推出的格斗类游戏，游戏以罗马角斗士之间的残酷战斗为背景，在游戏中玩家将扮演一位角斗士在决斗场上与敌人进行格斗。这听起来很像美剧《斯巴达克斯》里的情节，如果是剧迷们当然更不能错过这款游戏。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：无为无畏&发表于： 13:44:29
Air Penguin（中文名：飞翔的企鹅）是Android平台独占的一款跳跃类休闲游戏，一只企鹅在南极冰天雪地的浮冰上跳跃、滑行躲避，最后到达终点。
来源：手机中国&作者：不详&发表于： 09:58:23
僵尸游戏目前在手机平台上已经极度泛滥，不过当一些趣味很强的游戏出现时仍然能够让人觉得手心痒痒。今天我们为大家介绍的是一款iOS平台僵尸与疯狂摩托相结合的动作类游戏，游戏通过重力感应和手指触摸来控制摩托的平衡，相信能够引起大家的兴趣。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：白鸽男孩&发表于： 11:24:17
创新工厂最近出了一款名为机友大作战的Android游戏，白鸽看了看虽然颇为简单，但还是有一定的可玩性的。游戏的主旨是以你手机中的内容作为能力参数来和广大机友们在线对战。
来源：手机中国&作者：不详&发表于： 09:52:53
机器人科迪（Cordy）一款是Android平台上一款非常受欢迎的趣味游戏，由于采用了卡通风格以及3D效果，让这款游戏远比2D游戏更加具有感染力，带给玩家轻松活泼的气氛。
来源：手机中国&作者：不详&发表于： 10:01:22
很多朋友对体育竞技类游戏情有独钟，这类游戏对于游戏主角的动作技巧要求较高，而比分也是游戏中重要的一部分。基于这几点原因，玩家们时常会多次尝试通过某一关卡，屡次失败却也乐此不疲。今天笔者为大家介绍一款手机平台上的跑酷游戏Diversion，而且是逼真的3D版噢！
来源：手机中国&作者：不详&发表于： 10:06:21
自从植物大战僵尸之后，僵尸已经成为了手机游戏中的热门关键词。前不久，水果忍者开发商也推出了一款僵尸游戏，游戏的名字叫做Age of Zombies，翻译成中文就是僵尸时代。在这款游戏中玩家没有大量植物相助，完全靠自己的力量突出僵尸重围。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：白鸽男孩&发表于： 10:05:21
都说有一种神奇的能力叫做读心术，现在居然有一款叫做Akinator（阿基纳多）的软件也具备了这样的能力——你心中暗想一位明星，然后阿基纳多会向你提出各种各样的问题，但是通常只要二十个问题，它就能准确无误地猜出你心目中的偶像！怎么，不大相信？那么就和白鸽一起体验一番这款神奇的软件吧！
来源：手机中国&作者：不详&发表于： 10:19:01
在每个人的儿童时代，理想是做一名科学家、军人或者医生，当然也有孩子梦想有一天能够成为一名架桥修路的工程师。慢慢的长大，也许我们的理想也渐渐发生了变化，但儿时的梦想岂是能够随便磨灭。也许现实不允许，但我们可以通过一些虚拟的手段，实现我们儿时的梦想。
来源：dospy智能手机网&作者：无为无畏&发表于： 09:35:04
广大Android玩家期待已久的《Order & Chaos Online》在iOS版上线2个月后，终于登录Android，比预想的要早。《混沌与秩序》是全球最大手机游戏厂商Gameloft投入重金开发的智能手机网络游戏，号称手机上的魔兽世界。
页次：1/3&每页25 共72条 首页&&上一页&&&& 转到第 1 页第 2 页第 3 页